The regime stakes on populations and power elites support

Category status:
April 22, 2016 18:30

On May 3rd, President Lukashenko ordered to arrest a number of employees of a private clinic Ecomedservice who were responsible for the death of a patient. The president also instructed the Ministry of Health to take over control and management of the clinic.

Belarusian President still regards popular support as a basis for his legitimacy. The upcoming presidential elections force Lukahsenko to sacrifice the interests of the nomenclature and private business in favor of the mass electorate and the law enforcement agencies.

The disproportionate reaction of the president, and especially the state media, to a tragic accident in the Ecomedservice clinic demonstrates that the country’s leadership decided to use it as an excuse for creating a precedent. As a result, the private medical care institution was subordinated to the Health Ministry, while the shortcomings of private healthcare were publicly demonstrated to the population.

Background of the case: on March 26, a 23-year-old Grodno resident was undergoing rhinoplasty in the clinic and died a month later without regaining consciousness. Reports say the reason why the patient fell into a coma could have been malfunctioning medical ventilation apparatus, used during the surgery, and alleged staff negligence. Criminal proceedings were initiated and five staff members of the clinic were detained.

The state media reacted to the case with harsh criticism of commercial healthcare. Sovetskaya Belorussiya, the Presidential Administration newspaper on April 26th published a very emotional article with the main conclusion, that “posh medical centres are OK to take the money without ensuring vitally important equipment functions”. The largest national state TV channels also actively covered the case in accusatory manner.

Finally, President Lukashenko’s open intervention in the case implies that he wants to have the maximum political benefit from the case. Firstly, he hopes to improve his popularity and secondly, to revise the current rules of interaction between government and business in Belarus.

Traditionally, President Lukashenko regards people’s support as the main source of his legitimacy so he is particularly concerned about increasing his popularity before the 2015 elections (according to independent polls, in March 2013 his electoral rating was 33.4%). It seems the Belarusian authorities consider strengthening of the state authority as the main source for improving Lukashenko’s authority in the country - even at the cost of Belarusian private business.

This is the main ‘nationalization’ style for a number of enterprises – in confectionery, leather and now in private healthcare. Using all these cases, the president wants to demonstrate that a strong state is a more efficient owner than a private business. At the same time the president sends unambiguous signals to business and nomenclature, that he is ready to sacrifice their interests for the sake of his own. The criminal case, initiated recently against some officials regarding illegal hunting confirms this theses (Lukashenko mentioned it twice during interviews).

President Lukashenko’s main supporters in his policies are the law enforcement agencies. That’s why since 2012 their number was growing (Investigative Committee, Unified Forensic Examination Service). There is a reason to believe that the observed strengthening of the state, as well as the merger of interests of President Lukashenko and the power elites has reached sufficient inertia for these processes to continue at least until the elections in 2015

Similar articles

Minsk attempts to make up for image losses from military exercises by opening to Western values
October 02, 2017 11:49

The Belarusian authorities regard the Catholic conference as yet another international event to promote Minsk as a global negotiating platform. Minsk’s proposal to organise a meeting between the Roman-Catholic Church and the Russian Orthodox Church is rather an image-making undertaking than a serious intention. However, the authorities could somewhat extend the opportunities for the Roman-Catholic Church in Belarus due to developing contacts with the Catholic world.

Minsk is attempting to lay out a mosaic from various international religious, political and sportive events to shape a positive image of Belarus for promoting the Helsinki 2.0 idea.

Belarus’ invitation to the head of the Holy See for a meeting with the Patriarch of the Russian Orthodox Church should be regarded as a continuation of her foreign policy efforts in shaping Minsk’s peacekeeping image and enhancing Belarus’ international weight. The Belarusian authorities are aware that their initiative is unlikely to find supporters among the leadership of the Russian Orthodox Church in Moscow. In Russia, isolationist sentiments prevail.

In addition, for domestic audiences, the authorities make up for the lack of tangible economic growth with demonstrations of growth in Minsk’s authority at international level through providing a platform for religious, sportive and other dialogues.