Putin Brought Money in Exchange for Integration and “Firm Commitments”

Category status:
April 22, 2016 18:11

During the official visit of the Russian President Vladimir Putin to Belarus on 31 May-1 June, the parties agreed to develop investment,  trade and economic bilateral ties and cooperation within international organizations and unions such as the Customs Union, the Single Economic Space and The Eurasian Economic Community (EurAsEC). 

Vladimir Putin promised Alexander Lukashenko to provide financial aid in exchange for political support of The Eurasian Economic Community projects and privatization of Belarus’ assets by the Russian companies.

In the evening on May 31, Vladimir Putin announced that Belarus would receive the third credit tranche from the EurAsEC Anti-Crisis Fund in the amount of USD440 million (although it was scheduled in February 2012). Prior to that, in 2011, Belarus received two tranches of the loan (USD800 million and USD440 million). The total sum of the loan amounts to USD 3 billion, the interest rate is about 4% per annum. The fourth credit tranche in the amount of USD440 million is due in October this year.

During the official visit of the Russian delegation, Russia and Belarus  Belarus and Russia  have initialed the general contract for building the Belarusian nuclear power plant. It is expected to be signed in June in a solemn manner.

A design contract has already been signed. It provides for USD 204 million in finance. Moreover, the parties have signed a second contract worth $285 million which provides for financing of preparation work on site. The financing will be available in June. The total sum of the Russian credit for building the Belarusian nuclear power plant amounts to about USD10 billion, an average interest rate is 3.92%. 

Thus, Russia allocates external funding for Belarus in exchange for political support for the integration initiatives of the Russian government (Eurasian Union, Collective Security Treaty Organization (CSTO, etc.) , as well as the privatization of Belarus’ assets to Russian investors.

In the course of negotiations, Presidents of Belarus and Russia discussed the creation of the holding RosBelavto based on KAMAZ and MAZ assets. Russia might agree with MAZ market value estimated  by Belarus at a sum of USD 1 billion in exchange for a controlling stake in the newly created automobile holding company.

It could be expected that Belarus will sell state-owned shares of the telecommunications operator \"MTS\" (51%) to Russian investors. The transaction can amount to USD600-700 million.

In addition, at a at a narrow-format meeting, the parties discussed an increase in transshipment of Belarusian goods via the Baltic ports of Russia, which could lead to a decrease in the export of Belarusian goods via the ports of the Baltic countries (Lithuania, Latvia and Estonia).

Finally, the Belarusian side offered Russia to expand cooperation in trade of potash, nitrogen and phosphate fertilizers within the CJSC \"Belarusian Potash Company\". The company’s office can be transferred to Switzerland, which will enhance the ability to attract commercial financing for the implementation of joint investment projects.

For reference. According to the National Statistics Committee, the volume of foreign trade between Belarus and Russia in January-April 2012 increased as compared to the same period the previous year by 27% to USD 15.146 billion. Exports of Belarusian goods to Russia grew by 16, 9% to USD 5.027 billion; imports of Russian goods to Belarus increased by 32.6% up to USD 10.119 billion.

Similar articles

Belarusian and Ukrainian Defence Ministries entangle in confrontation spiral
October 02, 2017 11:57
Фото: RFRM

Over the past year, military-political relations between Minsk and Kyiv have become complicated. Due to their high inertia and peculiarities, this downward trend would be extremely difficult to overcome.

The root cause of the crisis is the absence of a common political agenda in the Belarusian-Ukrainian relations. Minsk is looking for a market for Belarusian exports in Ukraine and offers its services as a negotiation platform for the settlement of the Russo-Ukrainian war, thereby hoping to avoid political issues in the dialogue with Kiev. Meanwhile, Ukraine is hoping for political support from Minsk in the confrontation with Moscow. In addition, Ukraine’s integration with NATO presupposes her common position with the Alliance in relation to Belarus. The NATO leadership regards the Belarusian Armed Forces as an integral part of the Russian military machine in the western strategic front (the Baltic states and Poland). In addition, the ongoing military reform in Ukraine envisages a reduction in the number of generals and the domestic political struggle makes some Ukrainian top military leaders targets in politically motivated attacks.

Hence, the criticism of Belarus coming from Ukrainian military leadership is dictated primarily by internal and external political considerations, as well as by the need to protect the interests of generals, and only then by facts.

For instance, initially, the Ukrainian military leadership made statements about 100,000 Russian servicemen allegedly taking part in the Russo-Belarusian military drill West-2017. Then the exercises were labelled quazi-open and military observers from Ukraine refused to provide their assessment, which caused a negative reaction in Minsk. Further, without citing specific facts, it was stated that Russia was building up its military presence in Belarus.

Apparently, the Belarusian and Ukrainian Defence Ministries have entangled in a confrontational spiral (on the level of rhetoric). Moreover, only a small part of the overly hidden process has been disclosed. That said, third states are very likely to take advantage of the situation (or have already done so). This is not only about Russia.

The Belarusian Defence Ministry officials are restrained in assessing their Ukrainian counterparts. However, such a restraint is not enough. Current military-political relations between Belarus and Ukraine are unlikely to stabilise without the intervention of both presidents.

Recent trends