The split within the opposition to secure legitimacy of the Parliamentary elections

Category status:
April 22, 2016 17:49

The Belarusian opposition will not boycott the 2012 Parliamentary election campaign. The majority of the opposition movements will take part in it in one way or another, with the redistribution of political capital within the opposition as a major stake.

On 31 January six opposition parties and movements failed to reach a principled agreement on the participation in the upcoming parliamentary elections. Instead, four political movements signed a ‘Declaration for a public discussion’ about opposition’s participation in the elections.

On 31 January the Belarusian opposition “coalition of the six” split into three main groups around the issue of participation/boycott of the elections.

Firstly, supporters of the boycott of the elections include non-registered parties and organizations: the Belarusian Christian Democracy (BCD), the Organizing Committee of the People’s Assembly and the “Belaruski ruh” Movement. A demarche of Co-chairman of the BCD Vital Rymasheuski on January 31 wrecked the signing of a joint declaration.

Secondly, the registered parties and movements that signed the ‘Declaration for a Public Discussion’: the Belarusian Popular Front (BPF), the Belarusian Social Democratic Party (Gromada), “For Freedom” and “Tell the truth!” movements. The Belarusian Social Democratic Party (Gromada) joined the “coalition of the six” on the eve of signing of the Declaration. The ex-Communist Party “Fair World” is planning to join the Declaration at a later stage.

The Declaration calls for organization of a national debate about the format of the participation of the opposition in the parliamentary elections. It is an appeal to the “population”, which implies the signatories’ desire to share responsibility for the decision and, de facto, means a soft rejection of the idea of a boycott. The document was not signed by the leaders of these organizations, but by their deputies and coordinators, except for the Belarusian Social Democratic Party (Gromada).

The Declaration does not preclude political parties from the nomination of candidates for the elections, however provides for withdrawal of candidates, if the authorities fail to meet the set preconditions (the release of all political prisoners). Nevertheless, the Declaration allows its signatories to join the campaign, thereby filling it with a political content.

The United Civic Party dropped out of the “coalition”, regardless of its centered position in the past, leaning towards the participation as described in the Declaration. Most likely, the UCP will also take part in the elections, however by its own rules.

Therefore the pre-electoral balance of power and interests of the Belarusian opposition implies that the majority of parties and movements will participate in the campaign, at least when it starts. Without a doubt, the balance of forces within the opposition will change following the election campaign however chances are small that the campaign will change the balance of forces beyond the opposition.

Similar articles

Number of citizens excluded from social security system would be expanded
October 02, 2017 12:24

The Labour and the Tax Ministries are considering the possibility to include persons engaged in some economic activity without forming a legal entity in the social security system. When the decree No 337 comes into effect, the number of private entrepreneurs is likely to reduce due to the possibility of reducing the tax burden when switching to a tax payment as an individual. 95% of self-employed, including PE, pay insurance premiums on the basis of the minimum wage. The number of self-employed citizens is expected to increase, the number of insurance contributions to the pension system from PE will decrease, the number of citizens who will pay a fee to finance government spending will decrease by several tens. Self-employed citizens have the alternative not to pay social security fees and save resources for future pensions, which, given the gradual restriction by the state of pension requirements could be a more long-sighted option.

Recent trends